AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
jgray7700
April 10, 2014 06:17PM
Hello AFNI team. I am revising and resubmitting an article. One of the critiques it got is: "No rest periods were used between cue types (i.e., cigarette or neutral cues) to allow for hemodynamic response to settle; therefore the signal was "blurred" between conditions. Although the 3Ddeconvolve procedure used may theoretically be sufficient to achieve some separation, the design choice was suboptimal.."

Is there a particularly good 3dDeconvolve empirical article in support of its ability to model the hemodynamic response accurately?

Thanks!
Josh
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3dDeconvolve Question

jgray7700 April 10, 2014 06:17PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve Question

ziad April 15, 2014 11:13AM