AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
gang
April 18, 2014 02:56PM
> we noticed in our group level t-test on the Seed_ts parameter that we are not seeing
> high correlations (or a high beta value) in the tlrc BA25 region (it's actually surprisingly low).

Do you mean that you don't see statistically significant results at the seed region in the group output? Other than this, are you generally happy about the whole analysis? If so, don't worry about the seed region: This is *not* a simple correlation analysis; instead the results should be interpreted as the correlation between {the interaction of the condition and seed} and the target region.

Gang
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

PPI: Low Correlation in Group Level Seed Timecourse?

Nathaniel Harnett April 17, 2014 10:49PM

Re: PPI: Low Correlation in Group Level Seed Timecourse?

gang April 18, 2014 02:56PM

Re: PPI: Low Correlation in Group Level Seed Timecourse?

Nathaniel Harnett April 18, 2014 03:34PM

Re: PPI: Low Correlation in Group Level Seed Timecourse?

gang April 22, 2014 02:40PM