AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 22, 2014 09:24AM
Hi Afni Gurus,

I followed Gang's directions to run a simple correlation analysis using the time series from a seed voxel (http://afni.nimh.nih.gov/sscc/gangc/SimCorrAna.html), and then used each subjects' Z-transformed correlation map in a one-sample t-test (3dttest++).

The individual correlation maps looked good for each subject (similar values, similar regions), but the output of the t-test had outrageously significant T-values (if I normally threshold around p = .001 or .0001, I had to get down to 1 x 10^-13 to have anything meaningful). Is this similar to what you might expect? How does one pick a meaningful threshold in this case?

Thanks!
Subject Author Posted

Functional Connectivity Group Maps T-threshold

sh027969 April 22, 2014 09:24AM

Re: Functional Connectivity Group Maps T-threshold

gang April 22, 2014 02:43PM

Re: Functional Connectivity Group Maps T-threshold

sh027969 April 22, 2014 03:00PM

Re: Functional Connectivity Group Maps T-threshold

gang April 23, 2014 10:18AM

Re: Functional Connectivity Group Maps T-threshold

sh027969 April 24, 2014 12:24PM