AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 11, 2014 10:27PM
No please don't worry about it. I simply appended it into the proc.SUBJ file as such:

1dBport -nodata $nt 2.5 -band 0.008 0.07 -invert -nozero > rm.bpass.1D
1d_tool.py -infile rm.bpass.1D -pad_into_many_runs $run $#runs -set_run_lengths $tr_counts \
-write bpass.r$run.1D

The execution however is taking a long time on my practice subject. I am afraid it may be stalled out here:

++ N.B.: 3dREMLfit command above written to file stats.REML_cmd
++ (b) Visualization/analysis of the matrix via ExamineXmat.R
++ (c) Synthesis of sub-model datasets using 3dSynthesize
++ ==========================================================
++ Wrote matrix values to file X.nocensor.xmat.1D
++ ----- Signal+Baseline matrix condition [X] (861x661): 61.5911 ++ GOOD ++
++ ----- Signal-only matrix condition [X] (861x14): 1.51395 ++ VERY GOOD ++
++ ----- Baseline-only matrix condition [X] (861x647): 60.7251 ++ GOOD ++
++ ----- stim_base-only matrix condition [X] (861x623): 55.8368 ++ GOOD ++
++ ----- polort-only matrix condition [X] (861x24): 1.05807 ++ VERY GOOD ++

If this seems suspicious to you let me know. I am leaving the regression to see if it runs overnight but not sure what comes next if it hasn't progressed. Granted this could be because the tsch -xef states " + Number of parameters: 661 [647 baseline ; 14 signal] "

~`Dane
Subject Author Posted

Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders June 30, 2014 12:59AM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

rick reynolds June 30, 2014 10:18AM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders June 30, 2014 07:55PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

rick reynolds July 01, 2014 09:11AM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders July 05, 2014 09:00PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

rick reynolds July 09, 2014 10:17AM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders July 09, 2014 07:57PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

rick reynolds July 09, 2014 09:10PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders July 09, 2014 10:21PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

rick reynolds July 10, 2014 01:35PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders July 10, 2014 10:22PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

rick reynolds July 11, 2014 09:15AM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders July 11, 2014 10:27PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders July 12, 2014 11:11PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

rick reynolds July 13, 2014 02:32PM

Re: Bandpass + 3dDeconvolve for tasked-based FC analysis

d6anders July 08, 2014 03:56PM