AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 10, 2014 09:29AM
Here is the tests that I have run. I am summarizing the afni commands to help with clarity.

3dMEMA -groups Controls Subjects -mask mask_group+tlrc \
-set Subjects \
Subject1 Subject1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Subject2 Subject2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Subject3 Subject3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Subject4 Subject4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
-set Controls \
Control1 Control1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Control2 Control2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Control3 Control3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Control4 Control4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]'

The output BRIK for this command has the following sub-briks:
0) Controls:b
1) Controls:t
2) Subjects:b
3) Subjects:t
4) Subjects-Controls:b
5) Subjects-Controls:t
6) Controls:tau^2
7) Controls:QE
8) Subjects:tau^2
9) Subjects:QE
10) tau1^2/tau2^2
11) tau2^2/tau1^2

The resuls in general show that the differences between Subjects-Controls are negative. This is also reflected in the beta values with the beta values for the Control group larger than the Subject group.


I also ran 3dttest++ on the same datasets as follows

3dttest++ -setA Subjects \
Subject1 Subject1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Subject2 Subject2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Subject3 Subject3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Subject4 Subject4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Subject4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
-setB Controls
Control1 Control1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control1_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Control2 Control2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control2_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Control3 Control3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control3_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]' \
Control4 Control4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Coef]' Control4_REML+tlrc'[Cond1#0_Tstat]'

The output of this command produces a BRIK with the following sub-briks:
0) Subjects-Controls_mean
1) Subjects-Controls_Tstat
2) Subjects_mean
3) Subjects_Tstat
4) Controls_mean
5) Controls_Tstat

The differences between Subjects-Controls generated here are largerly positive and the Subject means are largerly greater than the Control means.

I am trying to reconcile the differences between these two sets of results.
Subject Author Posted

3dMEMA Bug

vmagnotta July 09, 2014 12:28PM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

gang July 09, 2014 01:15PM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

vmagnotta July 10, 2014 09:29AM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

gang July 10, 2014 10:05AM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

vmagnotta July 10, 2014 10:43AM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

gang July 10, 2014 11:13AM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

vmagnotta July 10, 2014 03:24PM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

gang July 11, 2014 01:25PM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

vmagnotta July 11, 2014 03:05PM

Re: 3dMEMA Bug

rick reynolds July 10, 2014 11:37AM