AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 21, 2014 04:22PM
Hi Linda,

I am curious why you use 3dcalc to extract a beta of
interest in the first place. Generally, I would try to
use sub-brick selection in group tests. Note that there
is also an option of extracting or applying sub-brick
selection via labels, e.g.

3dbucket -prefix con1_beta0 stats+tlrc"[con1#0_Coef]"

or maybe:

3dttest++ -setA horses ...
subjXX horses/subjXX/subjXX.results/stats.subjXX+tlrc"[con1#0_Coef]" ...


But the -iresp output is different in any case. It
contains the response function estimate at each voxel,
and is the sum of each beta times that response curve.

SPMG2 has 2 response curves: a gamma-variate and its
derivative, and yields 2 beta weights. The iresp
output (at any voxel) is the sum of each beta times
its curve.

To answer your actual question, yes, you can get the
beta directly without using 3dcalc (see the examples
above). However, the -iresp output is not the way to
do that.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

Problem about the -iresp in 3dDeconvolve?

Linda July 21, 2014 11:22AM

Re: Problem about the -iresp in 3dDeconvolve?

rick reynolds July 21, 2014 04:22PM

Re: Problem about the -iresp in 3dDeconvolve?

Linda July 21, 2014 04:53PM

Re: Problem about the -iresp in 3dDeconvolve?

rick reynolds July 22, 2014 01:01PM