AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 29, 2014 02:39PM
I'm trying to use 3dLME for a two group, two timepoint analysis with covariates. It's basically a repeated measures ANOVA in which I want to look for longitudinal stability in the control group and decline in the patient group. My strategy is to look for stability in the controls by using 3dICC_REML, and then to look for change in the patients vs the controls (group X time interaction) using 3dLME with a mask that is the control ICC map, thresholded. My questions:

1) is 3dLME the right choice for this, or is 3dMVM just as good?
2) does the model and glt look correct? I've tried running this with or without the "time : 1*time1 -1*time2" portion of the GLT and get the exact same results with/without it.
3) does the combined 3dICC_REML + LME approach sound statistically legit?

3dLME -prefix /data/mridata/jbrown/ptnt_hc_lme.nii -jobs 16 \
-model 'time*group+age+sex+interscan' \
-qVars 'age,interscan' \
-qVarsCenters '68.79,188' \
-ranEff '~1+age+sex+interscan' \
-SS_type 3 \
-mask /data/mridata/jbrown/nc_icc_covars_timefixed_thr4.nii \
-num_glt 1 \
-gltLabel 1 'grpXtime' -gltCode 1 'group : 1*hc -1*ptnt time : 1*time1 -1*time2' \
-dataTable \
Subj time group age sex interscan InputFile \
10886 time1 ptnt 65.65 M 202 con_0001.nii \
10886 time2 ptnt 65.65 M 202 con_0001.nii \
12162 time1 ptnt 66.20 F 183 con_0001.nii \
12162 time2 ptnt 66.20 F 183 con_0001.nii \
...
2679 time1 hc 75.77 F 202 con_0001.nii \
2679 time2 hc 75.77 F 202 con_0001.nii \
6909 time1 hc 67.41 M 164 con_0001.nii \
6909 time2 hc 67.41 M 164 con_0001.nii \
...

thanks!
Jesse



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/29/2014 02:42PM by jbrown.
Subject Author Posted

3dLME for longitudinal control vs. patient study?

jbrown August 29, 2014 02:39PM

Re: 3dLME for longitudinal control vs. patient study?

gang August 29, 2014 04:56PM