AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 22, 2014 03:09PM
Hi Sarah,

3dFourier only removes linear trends. Consider
3dBandpass instead, which removes quadratic trends.
On top of that, 3dBandpass can remove the other
regressors of no interest. With 3dFourier, you
would have to run it on those regressors separately.

Actually, in afni_proc.py, neither program is used
for bandpassing, as they would not allow for proper
censoring. In afni_proc.py, censoring, bandpassing
and removal of undesirable signals is done in a
single linear regression step. The polort used in
afni_proc.py is at least 1, but is still based on
the length of data.

I should add that using polort 2 should be sufficient
when bandpassing out the lower frequencies.

Note that afni_restproc.py was written by Rayus
Kulicki in Tulsa, and support must come from there.
It is different from (but based on) afni_proc.py.
I will offer replies in terms of afni_proc.py, of
course.

- rick



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/22/2014 03:09PM by rick reynolds.
Subject Author Posted

Resting-state Polort

S September 22, 2014 01:53PM

Re: Resting-state Polort

rick reynolds September 22, 2014 03:09PM

Re: Resting-state Polort

S September 22, 2014 03:57PM

Re: Resting-state Polort

rick reynolds September 22, 2014 04:04PM