AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 27, 2015 02:05AM
Hello, again-

Ok, glad that's all working fine.

Now, if I'm not mistaken, are you running probabilistic tractography? That is, '3dTrackID -mode PROB ....'? If so, this does not produce a tract file (which would have an ending *.niml.tract). Probabilistic tracking produces volumes of voxels where white matter is likely to be going- the trade-off in using PROB tracking is that, while you don't get explicit tracts, you do get much more robust locations of white matter (hopefully), because lots of Monte Carlo simulations of perturbed DTI parameters are run, and only those voxels that get hit a lot get kept. In this case, what you would view is a volume of white matter, which is what your file "NET_000_ROI_001_002+orig" would be showing you in your command:

$suma -vol /media/larson_buffalo/MRI7/KAward/Conditioning_From_Cluster/K_dti/sub238/dmri/DTI/o.PR/NET_000_ROI_001_002+orig -vol /media/larson_buffalo/MRI7/KAward/Conditioning_From_Cluster/K_dti/sub238/dmri/DTI/o.PR_000_PAIRMAP+orig -gdset /media/larson_buffalo/MRI7/KAward/Conditioning_From_Cluster/K_dti/sub238/dmri/DTI/o.PR_000.niml.dset -vol /media/larson_buffalo/MRI7/KAward/Conditioning_From_Cluster/K_dti/sub238/DTI/DT_FA+orig

If you *had* run deterministic tracking, or if you want to do so for comparison and/or tract viewing, then you can run '3dTrackID -mode DET' and you will get, along wtih the PAIRMAP and INDIMAP volume files, a file of ending in 'niml.tract'. This you would load into SUMA with 'suma -tract FILENAME.niml.tract ....' with other stuff, and then you will see tracts.

If you have fairly sparse targets around the brain that you are connecting, then you can also use the mini-probabilistic tracking mode, to view tracts *while also* taking into account uncertainty a bit. This would be with '3dTrackID -mode MINIP ...', and there's an example in the FATCAT_DEMO set in script Do_08dti_miniprob_track.tcsh.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

Emily January 26, 2015 06:29PM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

ptaylor January 27, 2015 02:05AM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

Emily January 27, 2015 10:58AM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

ptaylor January 27, 2015 02:43PM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

Emily January 29, 2015 01:31PM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

ptaylor January 29, 2015 03:46PM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

Emily January 30, 2015 11:16AM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

ptaylor January 30, 2015 01:09PM

Re: Viewing white matter tracts via SUMA

ptaylor February 04, 2015 06:46AM