AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 23, 2015 03:28PM
The problem exist in the group analysis. I checked the iresp of several individual subjects and it is not just below average but also a negative-going response (i.e., betas going below baseline and then back up to baseline).
I used the general mean (across subjects and conditions). Would it make sense to use across-subjects means for each condition separately? My initial problem was large reaction time differences between conditions. It doesn't sound like it can change negative-going to positive-going HDRs, but from your answer it seems like it might help to decrease extreme cases. Does it make sense? Do you have any other idea for what am I going wrong?

Thanks a lot for all your help!
kallai
Subject Author Posted

Regressing out reaction time

kallai February 18, 2015 05:14PM

Re: Regressing out reaction time

gang February 18, 2015 05:37PM

Re: Regressing out reaction time

kallai February 19, 2015 03:52AM

Re: Regressing out reaction time

gang February 19, 2015 10:29AM

Re: Regressing out reaction time

kallai February 23, 2015 08:57AM

Re: Regressing out reaction time

gang February 23, 2015 02:55PM

Re: Regressing out reaction time

kallai February 23, 2015 03:28PM

Re: Regressing out reaction time

gang February 23, 2015 03:51PM