AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 03, 2015 09:25AM
Hi Gang,

This is correct. I ran 3dREMLfit on all runs, and want to take the absolute value of dset a and dset b for each participant.

I ran the 3dcalc script you wrote for each pair of runs I need the absolute difference for, and this only was successful for 2 participants. For the other 6 participants, a 'fatal error' came up saying, "Multi-brick datasets don't match!". I am new to afni, and the preprocessing was completed and 3dREMLfit script was already written for each subject before I came onboard with this data. This is the 3dREMLfit script:

3dREMLfit -matrix X.xmat.1D -input pb04.3271456_20140102.mid1.r01.scale+tlrc.HEAD \
-fout -tout -Rbuck stats.3271456_20140102.mid1_REML -Rvar stats.3271456_20140102.mid1_REMLvar \
-Rfitts fitts.3271456_20140102.mid1_REML -Rerrts errts.3271456_20140102.mid1_REML -verb $*

I assumed that by the time this script was run, the voxels would be in a standard space. Did that not happen based on what you see here? Could the fatal error be because the matrices were not standardized?

Additionally, for the 2 participants where 3dcalc was successful, there was SO MUCH activation outside of the brain. Why is this happening? I know that a mask can be used so that we only see activation where the functional voxels are, but regardless of whether or not you use the mask, there shouldn't be SO much activation outside of the brain, right? I have not observed this with FSL or brainvoyager, and the amount of activation outside the brain really bothers me. Does this point to an error in preprocessing?

Thank you SO much for your help!!

Lindsay
Subject Author Posted

Blind, within-subjects analysis

lindsayr February 27, 2015 10:03AM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

gang February 27, 2015 10:11AM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

lindsayr February 27, 2015 10:24AM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

gang February 27, 2015 02:07PM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

lindsayr March 03, 2015 09:25AM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

gang March 03, 2015 10:30AM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

lindsayr March 03, 2015 11:20AM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

gang March 03, 2015 12:15PM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

lindsayr March 03, 2015 04:30PM

Re: Blind, within-subjects analysis

gang March 03, 2015 05:10PM