AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 15, 2015 09:21PM
Hi Joseph,

Using AM1 simply applies the modulators to the individual
responses, rather than allowing for a mean response along
with modulation responses. The single regressor in AM1
should be the sum of the modulation regressors (including
the mean, so 3 in your case).

Note that when the stimulus events are so very long (2-3
minutes?), the main regressor would likely eat up much
more variance than the modulation terms, though that
depends on the strength of the modulation response, of
course. Also, be very careful with the baseline model.
Having only 3 long events in a run makes distinguishing
baseline from task more difficult.

Getting to the implied question, I am not sure what you
might want with only 2 regressors. Would one be the
mean and the other a combined modulation? To compare
with the SPM result, how many betas did the other one
generate, 1 or 2?

- rick
Subject Author Posted

AM1 with 2 married paramaters not producing two sets of beta weights

jdviviano July 15, 2015 06:58PM

Re: AM1 with 2 married paramaters not producing two sets of beta weights

rick reynolds July 15, 2015 09:21PM

Re: AM1 with 2 married paramaters not producing two sets of beta weights

jdviviano July 16, 2015 11:43AM