AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
George Tourtellot
December 01, 2002 12:24PM
Hello,
another problem were're having using to3d with our Siemens Allegra dicom format:

we have some anatomical data (T2 weighted) with resolution 112x128 pixels, (the FOV was 168 x 192). When we create a BRIK with to3d, the axial image looks smeared and has regularly spaced dark horizontal lines, the sagittal image has regularly spaced dark vertical lines, and the coronal image has nice-looking coronal images for an entire volume positioned horizontally one after the other.
The sagital and axial images make this seem like a resolution problem. I've tried messing with the 3D:hglobal:himage:nx:ny:nz:fname option in to3d, but this didn't seem to help.
The other anatomical data we collected looked fine (but it was T1 weighted), and we're not sure what's different with this.

let me know if you'd like to see this data,
and (Bob Cox) thanks for having offered to mess with this data format for our mosaic problem,

George
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

dicom, anat, resolution

George Tourtellot December 01, 2002 12:24PM

Re: dicom, anat, resolution

bob cox December 02, 2002 08:40AM

DICOM fixed (for now)

bob cox December 02, 2002 07:18PM