AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 08, 2017 09:32AM
I've got the corrected data and am looking at it now.

I think what you are seeing is due to the intersection of 2 functions in AFNI.
  1. The overlay is at a lower resolution than the underlay, so it is resampled to match to underlay grid for display.
  2. The default resampling method is Linear interpolation.
Your overlay data isn't some value that is more-or-less continuous in space (such as a beta weight or t-statistic), where linear interpolation makes sense. It is a discrete value, and so interpolation between 2 and 3 to get (say) 2.5 makes no sense.

You can turn off this linear interpolation. Click on Define Datamode and you will see two controls, OLay Resam mode and Stat Resam mode. Change both of these to NN and your overlay image will suddenly go from smooth to blocky.

This switch of texture, from smooth to blocky, is very visible if you zoom in on the region of interest, but it is apparent even with no zooming.

How did I find this? I did something "tricky" or "hidden" in the AFNI GUI, that few people know about. I put the Overlay in as the Underlay temporarily (using the "U]" key into the image viewer). Then I opened the Disp control in the viewer, and chose RowGraphs to be 1. This shows a graph of the data in the underlay image underneath the row where the image crosshairs are. It was obvious then that some intermediate values were being created by interpolation.
Subject Author Posted

Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS January 26, 2017 12:21PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

ptaylor January 26, 2017 02:22PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS January 26, 2017 04:48PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

rick reynolds January 26, 2017 02:29PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS January 26, 2017 04:53PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

Bob Cox January 26, 2017 02:33PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS January 26, 2017 05:37PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

rick reynolds February 06, 2017 05:54PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS February 07, 2017 01:22PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

Bob Cox February 07, 2017 02:52PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS February 07, 2017 03:04PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

gregoryrsl February 04, 2017 07:01PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

Bob Cox February 06, 2017 03:23PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS February 07, 2017 01:24PM

Re: Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

Bob Cox February 08, 2017 09:32AM

FIXED - Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

Bob Cox February 10, 2017 09:50AM

Re: FIXED - Problems viewing conjunction analysis results

KendraS February 16, 2017 10:36AM