AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
rick reynolds
April 18, 2018 09:33AM
Hi Yu,

Those are fundamentally the same scripts, except for the
restrictions of the random event generating programs.
@DesignSearch uses RSFgen by Doug Ward (written
almost 20 years ago). The @stim_analyze script works
with make_random_timing.py.

The real question is which such program is capable of
generating events suitable to your needs.

make_random_timing.py is capable of handing far more
advanced designs (which does not mean it can handle
any design - it cannot).

- rick
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Which script is better for generating optimal experimental sequence?

Zhang Yu April 15, 2018 02:44PM

Re: Which script is better for generating optimal experimental sequence?

rick reynolds April 18, 2018 09:33AM