AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 15, 2018 07:14AM
They are within-subject factors.

Our event-related design is a 2x2 factorial. There is a factor of social partner (peer or computer) and type of reply to a questions (agree or away). So there are 4 conditions nested within two factors.

Currently I am taking your previously-suggested approach and extracting the 1st level beta values from the post-hoc contrasts peer-comp.agree and peer-comp.away and then looking at the effect of agree/away at the 2nd level.

My research question primarily revolves around the peer-computer contrast, but I want to account for the other factor in the analysis because I would expect an interaction between partner and reply type.
Subject Author Posted

BayesianGroupAna and gPPI question

dmoracze May 14, 2018 03:57PM

Re: BayesianGroupAna and gPPI question

gang May 14, 2018 04:55PM

Re: BayesianGroupAna and gPPI question

dmoracze August 14, 2018 11:04AM

Re: BayesianGroupAna and gPPI question

gang August 14, 2018 05:07PM

Re: BayesianGroupAna and gPPI question

dmoracze August 15, 2018 07:14AM

Re: BayesianGroupAna and gPPI question

gang August 16, 2018 09:54AM