AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
benne257
March 05, 2019 05:14PM
I am beginning to write the script for modeling Valence and Predictability as within-subjects factors, Age and Sex as between-subjects factors, and PCL-5 as a within-subjects quantitative variable (or would PCL-5 be a between-subjects factor if it is a measure of PTSD symptoms that is only measured once?). Below is a sketch of that script. The examples on [afni.nimh.nih.gov] don't quite align with what I want to look at, so I am not sure what -model should look like, if I need to center my qVars, and if I need to spell out each glt. Any thoughts or advice?

3dLME -prefix unc_cl_test -jobs 1
-model "Valence*Predict*PCL5+Age+Sex"
-qVars "Age,Sex,PCL5"
-qVarCenters ""
-ranEff '~1'
-SS_type 3
-num_glt
-gltLabel 1
-dataTable
Subj Valence Predict Age Sex PCL5 InputFile
102_day1 neg p 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
102_day1 neu p 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
102_day1 neg u 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
102_day1 neu u 49.3 m 14 /102_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
104_day1 neg p 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
104_day1 neu p 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
104_day1 neg u 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
104_day1 neu u 24.8 f 35 /104_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
109_day1 neg p 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
109_day1 neu p 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
109_day1 neg u 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
109_day1 neu u 21.7 f 46 /109_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
111_day1 neg p 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
111_day1 neu p 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
111_day1 neg u 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
111_day1 neu u 25.6 m 49 /111_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
119_day1 neg p 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneg_block+tlrc
119_day1 neu p 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Pneu_block+tlrc
119_day1 neg u 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
119_day1 neu u 44.6 f 26 /119_day1/unc_bl_results_peak/Uneg_block+tlrc
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 August 24, 2018 05:48PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang August 27, 2018 11:36AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 March 05, 2019 05:14PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang March 06, 2019 11:35AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 March 07, 2019 03:18PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang March 07, 2019 09:34PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 08, 2019 03:06PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 08, 2019 04:19PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 09, 2019 09:49AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 15, 2019 04:34PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 15, 2019 06:16PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 16, 2019 12:00PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 16, 2019 10:20PM