AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 07, 2019 03:18PM
Thanks so much! That is very helpful.

I saw in a different post that 3dLME will run the main effects and interactions, but the user has to specify all of the follow-up tests. Does that include looking at direct comparisons of the main effects? For instance, would the following follow-ups via glt be appropriate if I wanted to know look at all of the main effects and interactions with and without trauma severity (PCL5; see script below)?

Also, I am a little confused about glf. The description in the help page of glfCode makes it seem like it is typically used for testing the main effects and interaction -but isn't that what 3dLME is already doing?

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks again for your time.

3dLME -prefix unc_cl_test
-jobs 1
-model "Valence*Predict*PCL5+Age+Sex"
-qVars "Age,PCL5"
-ranEff '~1+Age'
-SS_type 3
-num_glt 14
-gltLabel 1 'neg-neu' -gltCode 1 'Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu'
-gltLabel 2 'u-p' -gltCode 2 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p'
-gltLabel 3 'Uneg-Uneu' -gltCode 3 'Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu Predict : 1*u'
-gltLabel 4 'Pneg-Pneu' -gltCode 4 'Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu Predict : 1*p'
-gltLabel 5 'Uneg-Pneg' -gltCode 5 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p Valence : 1*neg'
-gltLabel 6 'Uneu-Pneu' -gltCode 6 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p Valence : 1*neu'
-gltLabel 7 'Uneg-Pneu' -gltCode 7 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu'
-gltLabel 8 'neg-neu_PCL5' -gltCode 1 'Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu PCL5 :'
-gltLabel 9 'u-p_PCL5' -gltCode 2 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p PCL5 :'
-gltLabel 10 'Uneg-Uneu_PCL5' -gltCode 3 'Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu Predict : 1*u PCL5 :'
-gltLabel 11 'Pneg-Pneu_PCL5' -gltCode 4 'Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu Predict : 1*p PCL5 :'
-gltLabel 12 'Uneg-Pneg_PCL5' -gltCode 5 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p Valence : 1*neg PCL5 :'
-gltLabel 13 'Uneu-Pneu_PCL5' -gltCode 6 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p Valence : 1*neu PCL5 :'
-gltLabel 14 'Uneg-Pneu_PCL5' -gltCode 7 'Predict : 1*u - 1*p Valence : 1*neg - 1*neu PCL5 :'
-dataTable
Subj Valence Predict Age Sex PCL5 InputFile
Subject Author Posted

Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 August 24, 2018 05:48PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang August 27, 2018 11:36AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 March 05, 2019 05:14PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang March 06, 2019 11:35AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 March 07, 2019 03:18PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang March 07, 2019 09:34PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 08, 2019 03:06PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 08, 2019 04:19PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 09, 2019 09:49AM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 15, 2019 04:34PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 15, 2019 06:16PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

benne257 April 16, 2019 12:00PM

Re: Is 3dLME appropriate for my data?

gang April 16, 2019 10:20PM