AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
Daniel Glen
October 01, 2018 01:56PM
Just want to point out that if you smoothed at 8mm, you can't really reduce the smoothing to 4mm. On the other hand, you could potentially go from 4mm to 8mm with 3dBlurtoFWHM, but as Peter recommends, I think redoing the analysis is the proper way to do this. If you have a cluster available to you, this would take less time than the series of posts in the thread....
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

charujing123 September 27, 2018 05:10AM

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

Peter Molfese September 27, 2018 09:24AM

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

charujing123 September 27, 2018 11:00PM

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

Peter Molfese October 01, 2018 12:29PM

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

Daniel Glen October 01, 2018 01:56PM