AFNI Message Board

History of AFNI updates  

|
December 08, 2018 03:20AM
Dear all,

I want to find the difference of voxel-wise connectivity strength between group1 and group2,with 58 subjects in group1 and 24 subjects in group2.

To do this, i tried 3dttest++ with covariates, 3dttest, and 3dMEMA with covariates, with all the findings failed to pass the cluter size threshold, with p equals 0.001, 0.01 and 0.02 in turn.

i find a concept called small volume correction by accident, which can improve the significance when we are focusing on a specified region according to prior assumption. I used grey matter mask at the beginning, with subcortical areas followed, coming out smaller threshold, but the cluster size in the result has also been reduced, which means the findings still failed to pass the cluter size threshold.

However, when i try to focus on a smaller region, for example, hippocampus, it turns out that "mask has only 67 nonzero voxels; minimum allowed is 128.", with recommendation of -OKsmallmask in 3dCluterSim. while it makes me confused that it says "finding results, but your favorite cluster is too small to survive thresholding, so you post-hoc put a small mask down in that region. DON'T DO THIS!" in the help of -OKsmallmask.

Whether it's a proper way to focus on a small region when the findings failed to pass the cluster size threshold? And do anyone has some advice on how to check the data or getting it cross the threshold?

Best wishes,
Peng



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 12/08/2018 03:28AM by fz1002rp.
Subject Author Posted

How to improve the statisitcal significance?

Peng Ren December 08, 2018 03:20AM

Re: How to improve the statisitcal significance?

ptaylor December 12, 2018 11:08AM

Re: How to improve the statisitcal significance?

Peng Ren December 13, 2018 01:41AM

Re: How to improve the statisitcal significance?

Remi Gau December 14, 2018 11:01AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login