AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
December 12, 2018 11:08AM
Hi, Peng-

Well, I don't think there is a way to improve the significance. Basically, you should have one test or comparison in mind, and try it once, and the results you get are what you get. Most people set up their tests to be within a whole brain or gray matter tissue mask, and that's about that.

Something you could check is to make sure that your processing has actually gone well-- was alignment successful for each subject, for example? If you are doing a task-based FMRI study, did you put in the correct stimulus timings? Are you sure you have correctly labelled your subjects and their covariate values? Things like that.

Otherwise, your results are your results. Perhaps gather more subjects for more power?

--pt
Subject Author Posted

How to improve the statisitcal significance?

Peng Ren December 08, 2018 03:20AM

Re: How to improve the statisitcal significance?

ptaylor December 12, 2018 11:08AM

Re: How to improve the statisitcal significance?

Peng Ren December 13, 2018 01:41AM

Re: How to improve the statisitcal significance?

Remi Gau December 14, 2018 11:01AM