AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
gang
April 22, 2019 09:36PM
Hi Ahmad,

> Considering the missing data, I think 3dlme is my only option, is that right(I have only one group of subjects)?

Well, you have too much missing data, so I'm not so 1) whether missing-at-random is a reasonable assumption in your case, and 2) whether you have enough data to make robust inferences.

> my hypothesis is there is no differences between runs

Is that your real research hypothesis or is it the straw man for the null hypothesis significance framework?

> -model "1" \
> -ranEff 'Time+Subj' \

These two lines should be

-model "Time" \
-ranEff '~1' \

Gang
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3DLME Group Analysis with Missing Data

amayeli April 22, 2019 01:21PM

Re: 3DLME Group Analysis with Missing Data

gang April 22, 2019 09:36PM

Re: 3DLME Group Analysis with Missing Data

amayeli April 23, 2019 04:49PM

Re: 3DLME Group Analysis with Missing Data

gang April 24, 2019 12:18PM

Re: 3DLME Group Analysis with Missing Data

amayeli April 27, 2019 10:57PM