AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 12, 2019 03:48PM
Thank you both for your response I was getting the following warnings when concatenating the runs- where the task in run1 is "step" and the task in run2 is "stand".

++ Wrote matrix values to file X.nocensor.xmat.1D
++ ----- Signal+Baseline matrix condition [X] (1278x155): 3.58672 ++ VERY GOOD ++
*+ WARNING: !! in Signal+Baseline matrix:
* Largest singular value=1.99236
* 2 singular values are less than cutoff=1.99236e-07
* Implies strong collinearity in the matrix columns!
++ Signal+Baseline matrix singular values:
0 2.99845e-08 0.154872 0.252929 0.267126
0.269645 0.283077 0.29791 0.316453 0.330186
0.341668 0.342179 0.349798 0.36136 0.376046
0.384083 0.390261 0.392637 0.398798 0.406672
0.416771 0.436802 0.447039 0.450877 0.460095
0.468965 0.47245 0.482391 0.488204 0.488812
0.502547 0.524036 0.532249 0.549107 0.551849
0.554817 0.563324 0.582939 0.59116 0.591652
0.602114 0.602379 0.605666 0.60847 0.61215
0.614238 0.615671 0.624534 0.656948 0.663289
0.669554 0.672267 0.684408 0.687056 0.698804
0.718081 0.727385 0.734869 0.743858 0.760883
0.761613 0.764951 0.767428 0.770707 0.77948
0.782271 0.788038 0.817865 0.835145 0.843293
0.844543 0.854562 0.857737 0.858406 0.869383
0.879436 0.893794 0.897641 0.899713 0.916866
0.928522 0.945479 0.955541 0.958643 0.973911
0.977395 0.977843 0.991498 1.004 1.00762
1.00825 1.01852 1.01985 1.03094 1.03686
1.03754 1.04878 1.05049 1.05411 1.06561
1.06978 1.08776 1.10565 1.10678 1.11304
1.11314 1.11315 1.11781 1.1338 1.15188
1.15495 1.16197 1.17808 1.18682 1.23882
1.24677 1.24769 1.24847 1.25219 1.26929
1.27469 1.27684 1.29279 1.2955 1.29881
1.31165 1.33317 1.33667 1.34196 1.34841
1.35985 1.36439 1.37349 1.38997 1.40454
1.42434 1.44648 1.44826 1.45726 1.45848
1.4711 1.48664 1.51152 1.52194 1.5451
1.55 1.55583 1.57761 1.6568 1.67749
1.70381 1.71769 1.7346 1.7999 1.99236
++ ----- Signal-only matrix condition [X] (1278x11): 1.18921 ++ VERY GOOD ++
*+ WARNING: !! in Signal-only matrix:
* Largest singular value=1.41421
* 2 singular values are less than cutoff=1.41421e-07
* Implies strong collinearity in the matrix columns!
++ Signal-only matrix singular values:
0 0 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1.41421
1.41421
++ ----- Baseline-only matrix condition [X] (1278x144): 3.57446 ++ VERY GOOD ++
++ ----- stim_base-only matrix condition [X] (1278x108): 2.65822 ++ VERY GOOD ++
++ ----- polort-only matrix condition [X] (1278x36): 1.01608 ++ VERY GOOD ++
++ +++++ Matrix inverse average error = 0.000457856 ++ OK ++
++ Matrix setup time = 22.29 s

Warnings regarding Correlation Matrix: X.xmat.1D

severity correlation cosine regressor pair
-------- ----------- ------ ----------------------------------------
high: 0.705 0.725 (16 vs. 41) Run#1Pol#0 vs. step15_on#0
high: 0.705 0.725 (12 vs. 40) Run#2Pol#0 vs. stand30_on#0
Subject Author Posted

3dMema paired test

GMan August 11, 2019 07:20PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

gang August 12, 2019 10:37AM

Re: 3dMema paired test

GMan August 12, 2019 11:24AM

Re: 3dMema paired test

gang August 12, 2019 01:27PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

rick reynolds August 12, 2019 03:12PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

GMan August 12, 2019 03:48PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

GMan August 12, 2019 04:05PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

rick reynolds August 12, 2019 04:11PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

GMan August 12, 2019 05:08PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

rick reynolds August 12, 2019 05:31PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

Matthew Hoptman January 31, 2020 04:48PM

Re: 3dMema paired test

gang February 01, 2020 11:05AM