AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 30, 2019 09:33AM
Thanks for the response!

So if I understand correctly, the idea is rather than looking at the smoothness of the residuals from the full deconvolution model (or whatever method is being used), we're looking at the variance (across subjects, rather than across voxels?) in the individual betas we get from that model?

1. Does that mean we need to find a separate threshold for each and every contrast we want to look at?
2. DIf I understand correctly, this would mean that contrasts (or simple conditions) with more individual differences in activation level will necessitate larger clusters, because the betas will have larger residuals across subjects. Is that what we want to control for in cluster thresholding?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/31/2019 06:40AM by henrybrice.
Subject Author Posted

Input to 3dttest++ -Clustsim

henrybrice October 29, 2019 03:24AM

Re: Input to 3dttest++ -Clustsim

rick reynolds October 30, 2019 08:56AM

Re: Input to 3dttest++ -Clustsim

henrybrice October 30, 2019 09:33AM

Re: Input to 3dttest++ -Clustsim

rick reynolds November 06, 2019 09:20AM

Re: Input to 3dttest++ -Clustsim

henrybrice November 06, 2019 12:29PM

Re: Input to 3dttest++ -Clustsim

rick reynolds November 14, 2019 09:34AM