AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
December 04, 2019 05:04PM
Peter and I took a quick look at the data, and I think we found a good solution. The EPI data has very little anatomical structure, in that CSF is not very visible as a separate bright intensity, so cost functions that rely mostly on the inverse relationship between bright intensity in EPI and low intensity in anatomical datasets don't work well. The solution is a different cost function, of course. I usually try lpa+ZZ and/or nmi to get at least a rough alignment. Here, this worked well. The anatSS.nii.gz dataset isn't skullstripped as well as I would hope, but it's good enough for this affine transformation.

align_epi_anat.py -anat anatSS.nii.gz -epi myEPI.nii.gz -dset1_strip None -dset2_strip 3dAutomask -cost lpa+ZZ -suffix _test1 -epi_base 0
Subject Author Posted

Re: partial coverage alignment

nkemmotsu November 26, 2019 04:52PM

Re: partial coverage alignment

Peter Molfese November 26, 2019 08:00PM

Re: partial coverage alignment

nkemmotsu November 29, 2019 02:17PM

Re: partial coverage alignment

Peter Molfese December 02, 2019 02:10PM

Re: partial coverage alignment

Daniel Glen December 04, 2019 05:04PM

Re: partial coverage alignment

nkemmotsu December 11, 2019 03:59PM