AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 09, 2020 09:54AM
Hi, Clément-

You can change the header information for the dset in question, to correc the space from being "ORIG" to being "NMT", with:
3drefit -space NMT warp2std_nsu.nii.gz
That should adjust all related properties of the dset (qform and sform, for example)
nifti_tool -disp_hdr -infiles EEE.nii | grep qform
... and the last column that is output should be a '5' (which means the template is technically classified as 'NIFTI_XFORM_TEMPLATE_OTHER'; you can read more about the fascinating discussion of this variable and recent expansions to its set of values here:
[www.nitrc.org])

I believe the expectation is that every reference base will be something that has non-ORIG space value; afni_proc.py has to do work to predict the output names, and this seems a safe assumption. A reference "space" name can be assigned as above; however, probably some caution+circumspection should be used in applying this haphazardly (for interpretation's sake). In this present case, having an NMT template version with "ORIG" space is a mistake/relic of another era, and so using 3drefit to fix the header makes sense. For future work, using the 'modern' NMT_SS.nii.gz file that *does* have a space name will be highly preferable for pipeline flows.

We have been doing a lot of work with non-human templates (and "we" means Daniel Glen, basically), and non-human templates should still have non-ORIG space values. Actually, it is basically *because* of such a proliferation of non-MNI and non-Talairach templates that the new [qs]form value of '5' was created. If a given template of interest doesn't have a space name, please let us know; we would like to start helping people standardize/utilize these kinds of space names.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 03, 2020 05:38PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Daniel Glen January 03, 2020 05:58PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 07, 2020 05:48PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 08, 2020 09:46AM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 08, 2020 11:21AM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 08, 2020 12:09PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 08, 2020 12:35PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 08, 2020 01:03PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 08, 2020 12:37PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 08, 2020 11:47AM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 08, 2020 12:10PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 08, 2020 12:38PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Daniel Glen January 08, 2020 06:30PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 09, 2020 09:37AM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 09, 2020 09:54AM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 09, 2020 11:22AM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 09, 2020 12:00PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 09, 2020 12:06PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 09, 2020 12:27PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 15, 2020 06:21PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 21, 2020 05:49PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 21, 2020 10:56PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 22, 2020 10:14AM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 22, 2020 06:03PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys January 22, 2020 06:33PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

ptaylor January 22, 2020 06:46PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys February 13, 2020 01:15PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Doughboys May 21, 2020 09:27PM

Re: can't malloc -1437173116 bytes in 3dNwarpApply

Daniel Glen May 25, 2020 11:35PM