AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 31, 2020 10:30PM
Hi Cate,

That binarized map is essentially the thresholded, clustered map one might get from 3dClusterize, just without the clusters ordered by size. If you want to get the cluster table and volume, go ahead and run 3dClusterize. For example, assuming that dataset is called ETAC.global.2sid.5perc.nii.gz, consider:

3dClusterize -ithr 0 -idat 0 -inset ETAC.global.2sid.5perc.nii.gz \
                     -NN 2 -1sided RIGHT_TAIL 0.5 -clust_nvox 2 \
                     -pref_map ETAC.clust.order.nii.gz

That will threshold that binary dataset at 0.5, use NN2 neighbors, and require at least 2 voxels for a cluster (since they are already clustered, 1 voxel is probably enough, though some programs might whine about that).

Does that seem reasonable?

To verify cluster counts, compare the output table against:

3dhistog ETAC.global.2sid.5perc.nii.gz
3dhistog ETAC.clust.order.nii.gz

- rick
Subject Author Posted

ETAC output interpretation

Catherine Tallman March 31, 2020 06:43PM

Re: ETAC output interpretation

rick reynolds March 31, 2020 10:30PM

Re: ETAC output interpretation

Catherine Tallman April 01, 2020 06:58PM

Re: ETAC output interpretation

rick reynolds April 09, 2020 11:40AM

Re: ETAC output interpretation

Catherine Tallman April 06, 2020 12:14PM