AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 27, 2020 11:30AM
Hi Simone,

Those both apply FFTs after padding to a useful size. Trend removal in 3dBandPass might be done more appropriately. But really, 3dTproject is the most useful program for that operation. We generally do not use either 3dFourier or 3dBandPass. They are still distributed to avoid breaking people's existing processing streams.

Projecting out terms, whether band passing or not, should generally be done all at once (as is done with afni_proc.py, if you have tried that). Later projections, if they do not account for earlier projections, can re-add components that were previously removed. For example, doing band passing in one step before projecting motion regressors (and not accounting for it) in another is a mistake. In that case, those other nuisance regressors would also need to be band passed. And if censoring is done, it is all the more important do perform all operations in a single step.

So we suggest putting all projections into a single 3dTproject command.

Consider running a similar analysis (with even just one subject) for comparison using afni_proc.py, and see how the processing is performed.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

bandpass filtering

Simone Cauzzo May 23, 2020 07:06PM

Re: bandpass filtering

rick reynolds May 27, 2020 11:30AM