AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 10, 2021 08:49PM
Hi Caroline,

The TENT betas should be contiguous, ordered by mean response, then modulators.

So in this case, the 8 mean response betas for "hour_target" should be #0..#7, [50..64(2)], then come the 8 for the first modulator (RT), then the 8 for confidence.

The gltsym, when not provided with a condition index list, will use the sum of all betas. I think the output of the 3dDeconvolve execution should indicate that, if you would like to verify. For example, the all_targets GLT is probably 0.25 times the sum of 96 betas(!), 24 for each condition.

To get just the sum of the mean TENT response betas use ' .25*hour_targets[0..7] +...'

I am not sure about the follow-up. Do you mean you would like to look at the 8 betas of each modulation term, or something like an F-stat for it? Would you like to extract each of the 8 betas into a new dataset? If so, using 3dbucket with a selector like the above, [50..64(2)], should work. That means to extract volume index 50 though 64, with a step of 2 (i.e. 50, 52, 54, ..., 62, 64).

Alternatively, you could run 3dDeconvolve with the -iresp option, but that would give you a TR-grid time series of only the mean response.

Do you want the betas, stats or some GLT?

- rick
Subject Author Posted

Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman December 17, 2020 12:42PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

gang December 18, 2020 10:38AM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman December 18, 2020 12:18PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

gang December 20, 2020 07:51PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman December 21, 2020 03:30PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman September 10, 2021 02:22PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

rick reynolds September 10, 2021 08:49PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman September 15, 2021 01:07PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

rick reynolds September 17, 2021 05:16PM