AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 02, 2021 09:49AM
Hi, Cameron-

TL;DR of below is that I am not having the same performance issues on my Ubuntu 20.04, even with newest binaries and using all gzipped dsets. I think we do have some older binaries stored around, I will have to dig. But it would be better to solve this, so you don't have to use outdated code...

I assume if you run
afni_system_check.py -check_all
nothing gets flagged?

I don't see how this would be related, but I note that in July of 2020, the linux_ubuntu_16_64 binaries got bumped up to having shared object efficiency, in that libmri.so removed the degeneracy of dependencies and greatly reduced the file size of the distribution. That started at ver=20.2.03. I don't see how that could relate to this, but that was *a* big change for these binaries between the version numbers you are citing.

If I could ask about two more env vars, what are your outputs of these?
afni -no_detach -q -VAFNI_COMPRESSOR=
afni -no_detach -q -VAFNI_DONT_USE_PIGZ=
(The results on my comp for each of these is <BLANK>.)

--- my tests ---

I tested the binaries using Bootcamp dsets. Just to reduce heterogeneity, could you try the 3dROIstats commands below on the same dsets (downloadable from here, if you don't have it already:
[afni.nimh.nih.gov]
in AFNI_data6/afni/)

I just downloaded the latest binaries on my Ubuntu 20.04
Precompiled binary linux_ubuntu_16_64: Feb 25 2021 (Version AFNI_21.0.12 'Titus')

We have the same env variable output for those three:
$ afni -no_detach -quiet -VAFNI_COMPRESSOR=
<BLANK>

$ afni -no_detach -quiet -VAFNI_AUTOGZIP=
YES

$ afni -no_detach -quiet -VAFNI_NOMMAP=
<BLANK>

I ran this on the Bootcamp data (EPI has 152 vols and 2.75x2.75.3.00 mm**3 vox):
$ time ~/linux_ubuntu_16_64/3dROIstats -mask mask.auto.nii.gz epi_r1+orig.HEAD
File	Sub-brick	Mean_1  
epi_r1+orig.HEAD	0[#0]	1541.724452
epi_r1+orig.HEAD	1[#1]	1380.877077
epi_r1+orig.HEAD	2[#2]	1340.660904
epi_r1+orig.HEAD	3[#3]	1339.089622

epi_r1+orig.HEAD	148[#148]	1334.726368
epi_r1+orig.HEAD	149[#149]	1333.623429
epi_r1+orig.HEAD	150[#150]	1332.642166
epi_r1+orig.HEAD	151[#151]	1334.085370

real	0m0.103s
user	0m0.068s
sys	0m0.035s
getting good performance.

I also tried concatenating 4 of those time series together, to make a longer dset (and a gzipped one):
3dTcat -prefix LONG.nii.gz epi_r1+orig. epi_r1+orig. epi_r1+orig. epi_r1+orig.
... but even then the performance was still fine:
$ time ~/linux_ubuntu_16_64/3dROIstats -mask mask.auto.nii.gz LONG.nii.gz
File	Sub-brick	Mean_1  
LONG.nii.gz	0[#0]	1541.724452
LONG.nii.gz	1[#1]	1380.877077
LONG.nii.gz	2[#2]	1340.660904
LONG.nii.gz	3[#3]	1339.089622
.....
LONG.nii.gz	603[#147]	1334.791271
LONG.nii.gz	604[#148]	1334.726368
LONG.nii.gz	605[#149]	1333.623429
LONG.nii.gz	606[#150]	1332.642166
LONG.nii.gz	607[#151]	1334.085370

real	0m1.294s
user	0m1.154s
sys	0m0.140s

--pt
Subject Author Posted

AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

cameron February 26, 2021 04:49PM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

ptaylor February 26, 2021 05:12PM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

Daniel Glen February 28, 2021 01:05AM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

cameron March 01, 2021 01:05PM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

cameron March 01, 2021 01:02PM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

ptaylor March 02, 2021 09:49AM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

cameron March 03, 2021 10:03PM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

rick reynolds March 04, 2021 10:10AM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

rick reynolds March 04, 2021 11:58AM

Re: AFNI_21.0.12 Slow performance on Ubuntu 16.04 and 20.04

cameron March 04, 2021 02:08PM