AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
jef
March 24, 2021 10:47AM
Hello!

I'm trying to make sure I'm understand how the different parts of how 3dclustsim works.

I noticed if I don't specify a grey matter mask (i.e., no mask flag) in my 3dclustsim analysis, my k values are much lower. Intuitively, I would have expected the opposite. My goal is to include the whole brain in my calculation.

Could you help tease apart why my values vary so dramatically between using a grey matter mask (more stringent p/k value ratios) and no mask? I'm assuming the k values provided with the grey matter mask are correct because they are more stringent, but I just want to make sure I'm understanding why.

Thanks again!
Subject Author Posted

inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

jef March 24, 2021 10:47AM

Re: inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

RWCox March 24, 2021 05:26PM

Re: inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

ptaylor March 24, 2021 06:09PM

Re: inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

jef April 16, 2021 10:15AM

Re: inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

ptaylor April 16, 2021 10:50AM

Re: inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

jef April 16, 2021 02:47PM

Re: inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

jef April 28, 2021 05:12PM

Re: inflated 3dclustsim values with no mask?

ptaylor April 28, 2021 05:56PM