Thanks for your reply and sorry I missed your replies.
Here is what I was running originally
# Set path to the RX directory to save output
rx_path=/nas/longleaf/home/jess1/whole-brain-dev-social/analysis/thresholding
# Set path to the mask used in analyses #mask is at 70% threshold grey matter mask
mask=/nas/longleaf/home/jess1/whole-brain-dev-social/thresholding/group_mask_acrosswave.7.nii
# Run 3dClustSim using the average acf outputs from the script "calculate_average_ACF.Rmd"
#acf parameters were calculated at individual residual files, then averaged together. Note this is across 3 waves.
3dClustSim -mask ${mask} -acf 0.555380169013242 4.61362680991569 12.3309040184921 > ${rx_path}/threshold_SID.txt
and sample values.
# 3dClustSim -mask /nas/longleaf/home/jess1/whole-brain-dev-social/thresholding/group_mask_acrosswave.7.nii -acf 0.555380169013242 4.61362680$
# bi-sided thresholding
# Grid: 91x109x91 2.00x2.00x2.00 mm^3 (172610 voxels in mask)
#
# CLUSTER SIZE THRESHOLD(pthr,alpha) in Voxels
# -NN 3 | alpha = Prob(Cluster >= given size)
# pthr | .10000 .05000 .02000 .01000
# ------ | ------ ------ ------ ------
0.050000 1291.0 1565.2 1889.0 2153.0
0.020000 501.2 594.0 751.8 896.7
0.010000 281.3 343.6 433.0 491.7
0.005000 171.1 210.4 265.7 311.5
0.002000 97.3 120.6 153.2 186.7
0.001000 65.4 82.0 105.9 131.3
0.000500 45.2 57.3 74.5 92.8
0.000200 27.8 35.9 49.2 59.6
0.000100 19.1 25.5 35.8 43.0
Here is what I was running to see the effect of the mask.
# Run 3dClustSim using the average acf outputs from the script "calcualte_average_ACF.Rmd"
3dClustSim -acf 0.555380169013242 4.61362680991569 12.3309040184921 > ${rx_path}/threshold_SID_nomask.txt
and sample values of p/k values.
# 3dClustSim -acf 0.555380169013242 4.61362680991569 12.3309040184921
# bi-sided thresholding
# Grid: 64x64x32 3.50x3.50x3.50 mm^3 (131072 voxels)
#
# CLUSTER SIZE THRESHOLD(pthr,alpha) in Voxels
# -NN 3 | alpha = Prob(Cluster >= given size)
# pthr | .10000 .05000 .02000 .01000
# ------ | ------ ------ ------ ------
0.050000 463.0 537.0 624.0 708.0
0.020000 159.8 189.1 223.2 248.6
0.010000 86.6 101.6 123.6 141.3
0.005000 51.9 61.6 75.2 85.7
0.002000 29.4 35.1 43.3 50.6
0.001000 20.3 24.1 30.2 34.8
0.000500 14.5 17.3 21.6 25.4
0.000200 9.6 11.6 14.3 16.7
0.000100 7.1 8.6 10.9 12.6
Again, I'm assuming the second one is wrong, but trying to understand why it was so liberal. The first results also feel overly strict, but I trust those results more than the second version without a mask.
Thank you!!