AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 26, 2021 07:18PM
Hi all,

I recently watched a video in which Rick Reynolds made a case to avoid filtering resting state data at short TRs because of losses of degrees of freedom. He suggested using 3dTproject to get rid of unwanted frequencies (if I understood correctly). However, wouldn't that result in a loss of degrees of freedom? My sense was it mainly served to make the issue more explicit.

If the suggestion is not to bandpass at all, in the absence of physiological recordings, how could one address the frequencies associated with respiration (for example)? If one collects data at TR=2, then the frequencies could still include physiologically meaningful nonbrain signal (if respirations were slow, for example).

Thanks,
Matt
Subject Author Posted

filtering

Matthew Hoptman March 26, 2021 07:18PM