AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 19, 2021 12:36PM
Hello!

This is more of a conceptual question about MRI voxel signal issues. We have a dataset of ~150 subjects who completed a variety of tasks as well as resting state. Across the whole sample, signal just isn't very robust at the voxel level. Even for well established task paradigms (and even resting state), basic contrasts in expected regions are not surviving correction (expected regions emerge in task contrasts, but they ultimately don't survive correction). We're seeing this semi-weird phenomenon that while clusters of expected regions are certainly large enough to meet 3dClustSim thresholds, the voxel-wise significance is almost never achieved. Voxels in these large expected clusters are not passing even p<0.01. Obviously there are possible hardware concerns that could have contributed to the low SNR in voxels, but since we're past the point of fixing any of those issues, I'm wondering if there are any things we can do in preprocessing/alternative thresholding procedures we can use.

I'm not suggesting we do any p-hacking here, because there are clear effects in all of the tasks we have and in the predicted regions/direction (I'd also like to add these are not novel or complex tasks, for example one task is a go/no-go task with symbols, another is basic fear conditioning/extinction, and another is aversive picture viewing)... there's just something across the board about signal strength in this sample that is limiting "significance".

Any thoughts/advice are greatly appreciated!!

Carissa
Subject Author Posted

Low voxel significance but large clusters?

cnweis April 19, 2021 12:36PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

ptaylor April 19, 2021 06:23PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

cnweis April 19, 2021 07:12PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

ptaylor April 19, 2021 07:40PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

cnweis April 21, 2021 09:58AM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

ptaylor April 21, 2021 10:45AM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

cnweis April 21, 2021 11:49AM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

ptaylor April 21, 2021 12:01PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

cnweis April 26, 2021 11:44AM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

ptaylor April 26, 2021 01:32PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

cnweis April 26, 2021 03:36PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

ptaylor April 26, 2021 04:24PM

Re: Low voxel significance but large clusters?

cnweis May 19, 2021 11:45AM