AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 27, 2021 04:18PM
Hi, Jenna-

That is true that many of those large radcor magnitudes are outside the brain in both cases. And inside the brain, many of the high magnitudes are tightly located in GM (though also some in local WM and CSF, too).

How does your corr_brain map look? That might also provide a sense of how much global motion is left in, in an important way.

And are the seedbased correlation maps (under vstat) pretty localized?

I wonder if you processed this subject with lower enorm (0.2, say) and outlier frac (0.05, say), does this change things? I believe that you have a tricky population that you are studying, so I understand that you have constraints/tradeoffs possibly forcing the choice of the less strict motion censoring. It is a tricky balance.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

Radcor image retains noise after volreg Attachments

jkblujus April 26, 2021 09:48PM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg

ptaylor April 27, 2021 04:18PM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg Attachments

jkblujus April 27, 2021 08:54PM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg

rick reynolds April 28, 2021 08:16AM

Re: Radcor image retains noise after volreg

jkblujus April 28, 2021 03:44PM