> in lme4 (Time|Subj) is the same as (1+Time|Subj), if I am not mistaken?

Yes, they share exactly the same notation.

> For 3dLMEr so far, my next steps are input the residuals into 3dFWHMx and then use 3dClustsim for cluster correction
> - is there a way to do this with 3dMSS?

No, but you don't have to adopt a harsh thresholding approach, and instead show the results in a gradation fashion.

> -mrr 's(Time)+s(Time,by=Group)+(Age)+(Gender)' \
> -qVars 'Time,Group,Age' \

The above specification assumes that there are 10 or more time points. With 7 time points, try

-mrr 's(Time,k=7)+s(Time,by=Group,k=7)+Age+Gender'

> if I changed the model to Time*Group+Age+Gender+outcome1+outcome2+outcome3+(Time|Subj) , in order to
> be able to look at the effects of those outcome scores, I am basically correcting for them, am I not?

With this specification, you would be able to assess the association of each outcome with your outcome variable. However, I'm confused with your word "correcting": What do you mean by "correcting for them"?

Gang



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/02/2021 08:48AM by Gang.