AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 09, 2022 11:17AM
Indeed, as Paul notes, though afni_proc.py could likely be reasonably fixed to handle that, it seems just begging for trouble (in terms of both the complexity of afni_proc.py itself, and of people running it correctly). So my inclination for a "fix" would be to simply have the program error out, meaning you could not do it anyway.

Out of curiosity, why are you inclined to run the analysis in orig space, while wanting results in standard space? Unless there is basically zero motion for the subjects, that generally would not be worth doing.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

a possible bug in afni_proc.py

Mingbo August 04, 2022 08:44AM

Re: a possible bug in afni_proc.py

ptaylor August 05, 2022 10:20PM

Re: a possible bug in afni_proc.py

rick reynolds August 09, 2022 11:17AM

Re: a possible bug in afni_proc.py

Mingbo August 14, 2022 10:58PM

Re: a possible bug in afni_proc.py

rick reynolds August 15, 2022 11:29AM

Re: a possible bug in afni_proc.py

Mingbo August 16, 2022 04:22PM

Re: a possible bug in afni_proc.py

rick reynolds August 17, 2022 12:48PM