AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 26, 2023 08:23AM
> One rationale backing the current approach might be that we first need to regress out the (possibly existing) signals
> imposed by the driving input in order to generate data composed of pure noise.

I'm not so familiar with the implementation, but I suspect that is likely the rationale. I wonder how to flip the sign with the observed data (rather than the residuals) when one or more covariates (e.g., age) are involved. Is your simulation process similar to what's described in Dr. Cox's following paper?

[www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

My guess is that the approach adopted in 3dttest++ is intended to address the issue of spatial neighborhood relatedness, which may cause some deviations in the case of a single voxel as you found out.

Gang



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/26/2023 08:34AM by Gang.
Subject Author Posted

Why do -ETAC and -Clustsim methods in 3dttest++ permute full model residuals?

herrlich10 January 16, 2023 11:24AM

Re: Why do -ETAC and -Clustsim methods in 3dttest++ permute full model residuals?

herrlich10 January 25, 2023 11:46PM

Re: Why do -ETAC and -Clustsim methods in 3dttest++ permute full model residuals?

gang January 26, 2023 08:23AM

Re: Why do -ETAC and -Clustsim methods in 3dttest++ permute full model residuals?

RWCox January 29, 2023 04:04PM