AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 19, 2023 10:20AM
The only small point I might add is that adding "-radial_correlate_opts -polort 18" should have affected the @radial_correlate script as you hoped. There would be *2* -polort options in the command in the proc script, but yours would be later and therefore override the first (a subtle point).

But still, use the options Paul suggests.

A minor effect of this goes the opposite way though (with @radial_correlate). If you specify "-regress_polort 2", that should change the one used for @radial_correlate to be just 2, which is probably lower than preferable. It does not have a bandpassing option.

So even with Paul's suggestion, you might also add something like "-radial_correlate_opts -polort 9", just to have more reasonable detrending for those QC steps.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

MACAQUE afni_proc.py failed Attachments

Jewel May 18, 2023 05:29AM

Re: MACAQUE afni_proc.py failed

ptaylor May 18, 2023 09:41AM

Re: MACAQUE afni_proc.py failed

Jewel May 19, 2023 03:19AM

Re: MACAQUE afni_proc.py failed

ptaylor May 19, 2023 09:34AM

Re: MACAQUE afni_proc.py failed

rick reynolds May 19, 2023 10:20AM

Re: MACAQUE afni_proc.py failed

Jewel May 21, 2023 10:52PM