AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 25, 2023 02:24PM
Hi, Philipp-

The errts file is a residual from regression modeling. It should have mean zero. During regression, the baseline is modeled, and the baseline typically includes the mean value of the data.

When using the 'scale' block, the data prior to the regress block are scaled to have mean=100 and a (generously) capped range of [0,200]. This scaling is done on per voxel basis (as opposed to something like grand mean scaling, which is volume-wide), and so it creates a dataset that has the interpretation of "local BOLD % change" at each time series; the residuals have these units. This seems like a quantity with meaningful units that is as comparable as possible from resting state FMRI data.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

Scaling in AFNI proc for the .errts resting-state output

Philipp May 25, 2023 02:05PM

Re: Scaling in AFNI proc for the .errts resting-state output

ptaylor May 25, 2023 02:24PM

Re: Scaling in AFNI proc for the .errts resting-state output

Philipp May 25, 2023 02:38PM

Re: Scaling in AFNI proc for the .errts resting-state output

ptaylor May 25, 2023 03:04PM

Re: Scaling in AFNI proc for the .errts resting-state output

Philipp May 26, 2023 03:51AM