AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 20, 2003 10:25AM
Dear Sally,

Again, thanks very much for your answer. While I stilll hope to receive a reply from Doug, maybe I could add another question concerning a different fMRI study of ours in which, again, an SPSS-like Repeated Measures Design would be required for optimal statistical analysis of the data.

We have scanned 30 patients on two separate occasions (Measurement 1 (Baseline; 30 patients) and Measurement 2 (medication (15 patients) or placebo (15 patients)) and we would like to extract the medication-effect (corrected for baseline brain activation) on brain activation patterns during task-performance. Again, ANOVA does not take into account that some measurements were repeated in a single subject (i.e.: are paired).

The problem is therefore that we have two different groups in one study: one placebo, one medication, which all undergo the same procedure. A Repeated Measures Design would allow us to 'disentangle' these two, by first specifying a within-subject factor 'Treatment' with two levels (1 and 2), yielding an effect of treatment with either medication or placebo.

Then, a between-subject factor 'Group' with two levels (Medication and Placebo) can be specified, by which the study-population is separated into a group receiving placebo and one receiving medication. This will extract the effect that 'being a member' of one of those groups has on brain aktivation, and hence the medication effect. Additionally, it will account for possible pre-existent differences in brain activation at baseline between these groups that are due to small sample size and may mask or enhance medication effects.

Therefore in short, would current AFNI-code allow such a design? If so, add on every happy person to this world.

Rutger Goekoop
Subject Author Posted

Repeated Measures Design

Rutger Goekoop January 10, 2003 10:38AM

Re: Repeated Measures Design

Andrew Mayer January 16, 2003 10:45PM

Re: Repeated Measures Design

Rutger Goekoop January 17, 2003 03:39AM

Re: Repeated Measures Design (Right, Doug?)

sally durgerian January 17, 2003 11:06AM

Re: Repeated Measures Design (Right, Doug?)

Rutger Goekoop January 20, 2003 10:25AM

Re: Repeated Measures Design (Right, Doug?)

B. Douglas Ward January 20, 2003 12:52PM

Re: Repeated Measures Design (Right, Doug?)

sally durgerian January 20, 2003 04:34PM

Re: Thanks

Rutger Goekoop January 21, 2003 04:35AM