AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 07, 2003 04:58PM
Hi there,

would it be possible to add in an option to 3dTcorrelate to include some more 'nuisance' terms in the regression model, e.g., the nuisance caused by subjects who wouldn't stay completely still? I get lovely results for subs who are completely immobile, but there's a serious diminuendo in quality for people who scoot around just a little. (There's a good difference in results between with/without motion regressors with these subs using a standard model with 3dDeconvolve).

Perhaps more importantly, does it make sense to do this? I could too easily imagine that a big overdetermined mess could result... I had briefly thought about running 3dTcorrelate on the time-series residuals (after running with polorts and motion regressors), but this approach clearly has its pitfalls (e.g., one shouldn't really do it).

Any thoughts welcomed,

thanks,
Fred

Subject Author Posted

motion regressors for 3dTcorrelate?

Fred Dick March 07, 2003 04:58PM

Re: motion regressors for 3dTcorrelate?

bob cox March 12, 2003 06:55PM

Terrific - thanks!

Fred Dick March 12, 2003 07:38PM