AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 01, 2003 11:48AM

Hello Lukas:

As you stated, the only reason for using the "cliplevel" is to prevent loss
of numerical accuracy due to voxels with baseline close to zero. You should
set this "cliplevel" value low enough so that it does not exclude brain voxels.

The reason for loss of numerical accuracy is that, usually, the results are
stored as scaled short integers. The scale factor is determined by the
largest value (voxel) in the sub-brick. It is this scale factor which limits
the accuracy of the representation of the data. If a particular voxel's
baseline is close to zero, then division by the baseline may yield a very
large number, hence a large scale factor. Perhaps this (baseline near zero)
is not a problem for your data, in which case the "cliplevel" is not needed.

Yes, using a mask would be an acceptable alternative. But then, you would
have to determine the "cliplevel" for generating the mask.

Doug Ward
Subject Author Posted

percent signal change

Lukas Pezawas March 31, 2003 06:20PM

Re: percent signal change

B. Douglas Ward April 01, 2003 11:48AM

Re: percent signal change

Lukas Pezawas April 01, 2003 01:40PM