AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 06, 2003 11:25AM

Hello malf:

I am confused by your question. The "-rlt++" option of 3dTcat will add the
overall mean back in, so the "b0" coefficient should NOT be zero. Are you
sure that "it removed 'b0+b1t' together"? What are typical values for "b0"
contained in the output bucket dataset?

As Bob said, it is not necessary to use the "-rlt" option of 3dTcat, since
3dDeconvolve will fit a separate constant plus linear trend to each of the
concatenated runs. See the description of the "-concat" option in Sections
1.2.12 and 1.4.6 of the documentation in file 3dDeconvolve.ps.

Since you are using the baseline coefficient to standardize the data, it is
necessary for 3dDeconvolve to write the baseline coefficients to the output
bucket dataset. Hence, the command line should NOT include the "-nobout"
or "-nocout" options.

Note that, for concatenated runs, it may be preferable to "standardize" the
time series data prior to deconvolution. For a discussion of this alternative
approach, see the messages at or about:

[afni.nimh.nih.gov]

Doug Ward
Subject Author Posted

-rlt++

malf May 06, 2003 04:32AM

Re: -rlt++

bob cox May 06, 2003 10:59AM

Re: -rlt++

B. Douglas Ward May 06, 2003 11:25AM

Re: -rlt++

malf May 08, 2003 03:58AM