AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 23, 2014 09:10PM
Hi guys, thanks for the replies.

Pete, that's a good point about the preprocessing pipeline transforming the dead voxel nonzero. However, in my case, the dead voxels are actually zero, because they're zeroed out as a result of an MVPA analysis stream that uses full_mask to remove low-signal voxels from consideration of the classification methods. Different subjects have different low-signal voxels, which is what's creating this mess.

That being said, Gang's suggestion seems perfect, which is all the more annoying since I spent a bunch of time searching documentation. I must have missed -zskip because I was so focused on looking for a way to provide a mask (or a dataset where each sub-brick was a mask) that it didn't register.

Anyway, thanks very much to you both, great advice. Pete, I'll file your interpolation suggestion away for later, I can think of a few cases where it will be just the thing.
Subject Author Posted

3dttest++, masks, and constant values

shanusmagnus September 23, 2014 02:06PM

Re: 3dttest++, masks, and constant values

gang September 23, 2014 03:37PM

Re: 3dttest++, masks, and constant values

shanusmagnus September 23, 2014 09:10PM

Re: 3dttest++, masks, and constant values

Peter Molfese September 23, 2014 03:49PM