AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
April 22, 2014 01:42PM
I am noticing that many of my subjects have motion artifact that is strongly affecting my data. Motion correction using 3dregistration has been done in the preprocessing, and censor tr has been used to eliminate tr's with motion greater than 2 mm, but my problem persists. I am ending up with negative (blue) horizontal slices that are very clearly related to motion. I am thinking of reducing the criteria in censor tr to 1 mm to catch the motion that I am not catching at 2 mm but I am worried that I will loose too many images. Is there a different method of motion correction that I should try? One that deals with small but frequent head motion throughout the time course of the data collection. It seems to be more of a problem in our older adult population.
Subject Author Posted

Motion Correction After Scanning

adjacobson1 April 22, 2014 01:42PM

Re: Motion Correction After Scanning

Daniel Glen April 23, 2014 12:24PM