AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
wped
November 06, 2014 01:22PM
It sounds like at least a couple of people on here are using the pial surface in their surfclust commands. However, I've noticed the interactive clustering in suma uses the smoothed wm surface. This seems to make a significant difference for the size that the clusters are estimated at, thus changing which ones get kept.

I'm not seeing a slow_surf_clustsim.py option that specifies which surface the estimates are for. Is there a preferred surface to use in SurfClust?

Thanks!

Walker
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

surface clustering on pial or wm surface

wped November 06, 2014 01:22PM

Re: surface clustering on pial or wm surface

rick reynolds November 07, 2014 02:05PM

Re: surface clustering on pial or wm surface

wped November 10, 2014 10:47AM

Re: surface clustering on pial or wm surface

rick reynolds November 10, 2014 10:59AM

Re: surface clustering on pial or wm surface

wped November 10, 2014 01:37PM