AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 12, 2015 05:10PM
I'm hoping to extract statistics associated with a particular q value for surface data. For the same problem with volume data where, say, I wanted to get a t statistic associated with a q value of 0.05 for the 0th sub brick, I could implement this via fdrval in the following way:
fdrval -qinput stats.subj1+tlrc 0 0.05

However, the same syntax doesn't fly with surface data (though I can view the associated q values for these files in the SUMA gui, so an FDR correction has been applied):

the command: fdrval -qinput stats.subj1.lh.niml.dset 0 0.05
yields the following error: ** FATAL ERROR: fdrval dataset 'stats.subj1.lh.niml.dset[0]' doesn't have FDR curve

Is there any suma equivalent of the fdrval command or a way to implement this function for surface data?

PS- re: the delightful help notes for fdrval--I sincerely hope this post does not generate an email to my mother explaining how stupid I am.
Subject Author Posted

fdr values for surface data via fdrval-like command?

kabarnes January 12, 2015 05:10PM

Re: fdr values for surface data via fdrval-like command?

rick reynolds January 13, 2015 04:33PM

Re: fdr values for surface data via fdrval-like command?

kabarnes January 14, 2015 11:57AM