AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 30, 2017 11:48PM
Hi all,

Sorry for this basic question, but I'm having a bit of trouble interpreting the output of the ss_review_basic script. It says that there are 58 TRs above the motion limit (which is not surprising given that we're scanning kids), and 9 above the outlier limit, but then the total number of censored TRs is 88. Why is this number so much higher than the combined number of TRs censored due to motion/outliers? Is there some additional censoring going on that I forgot about?

Thanks,
Laura
Subject Author Posted

ss_review_basic output

Laura September 30, 2017 11:48PM

Re: ss_review_basic output

rick reynolds October 01, 2017 09:45AM