Show all posts by user
Dear AFNI users-
We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:
https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov
Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.
The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.
Sincerely,
AFNI HQ
History of AFNI updates
Page 1 of 1 Pages: 1
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Hello all,
The OHBM Open Science Special Interest Group is very happy to announce that the 8th Annual OHBM Brainhack will be held June 23-25 at Phi Centre in Montreal.
A hackathon? For who?
At the OHBM Brainhack, members of the community gather to work collaboratively on common projects. This year we would like to especially welcome new attendees who have never been to hackathon before
by
Remi Gau
-
AFNI Message Board
Dear neuroimagers,
We are organizing a hackathon to develop a tool to help researchers creating a pre-registration / registered-report for neuroimaging experiments:
The hackathon is embedded in the upcoming meeting of the Society for Improving Psychological Science in Rotterdam, NL, July 7-9.
We are thus interested in the challenges that people face when preregistering their studies. I
by
Remi Gau
-
AFNI Message Board
Some of you might be interested in this.
The neuroimaging quality control (niQC) special interest group (SIG) aims to standardize and develop best practices for niQC and Quality Assurance (QA). Learn more here: tinyurl.com/WeNeedNiQC
We invite you to fill this survey, to help us to get a sense of various types of QC/QA that is done in the neuroimaging community. We would like you to cover t
by
Remi Gau
-
AFNI Message Board
Hey,
I would just like to mention that adding more participants and running the same analysis can inflate your false positive rate and you should therefore properly control your type 1 error if you are planning to do this.
There are quite a few papers out about this but if you wanna start with lighter read you can check these posts:
- on Daniel Lakens' blog:
- on Kendrick Kay's
by
Remi Gau
-
AFNI Message Board